help needed here :)

Discussion forum for IAA members who have completed at least one (1) IAA Module.

Moderator: IAA Founders

help needed here :)

Postby The Mark on Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:08 am

this guy emaild me and has something on his mind, to tell you frankly i really dont get what he wants out of the project he is doin. but non the less, couple of things: 1st i really would want to be cleared on this subject and what possible project is he up to? 2nd im not deeply founded in my music theories so co-relating chords and frequency ratios messes me up( well especially this guy's email) hope any one of us can help :)
--- Dr Strange wrote:

> Hi, I was trying to find a music expert to ask a
> question of, I'm working on a sort of personal 'back
> yard' experiment, and it seems there is a musical
> component to it. I'm relatively
> ignorant to music theory (not completely) but much
> of it is Greek to me. I saw your name on the net as
> an expert and hoped to ask you a question. You don't
> know me and if you are
> too busy, no problem. I'm working on something that
> I think might really help people a lot
> and maybe even make a bit of a difference in the
> world, I dont say this to 'guilt' you into providing
> me advice, only to make my intentions clear. I also
> can't as yet fully describe what it is I'm actually
> working on, all I can do is describe a part of a
> process to you and hope you can fill in some blanks
> for me. Thats it, thats all Im seeking. I'm not a
> wacko who will try and con you with some sort of
> 'Nigerian' bank transfer spam weirdness. I'm just
> trying to find someone
> who's a lot smarter in music theory than me to offer
> me a bit of advice - thats it.
>
> So, if you feel free to offer your insight, here is
> the first part;
>
> I have a 'process', a sort of mechanism in place,
> when it runs it spits out what appears to be musical
> chords, however these chords are not always what
> might (from what I understand so far) be considered
> proper or normally harmonious musical chords to the
> western ear - although sometimes they are. Each
> chord will have two to three notes, usually three.
>
> What I need to be able to do is understand what
> makes one chord harmonious to another, so;
>
> I found the following formula for consonace, it
> seems incredibly simple, allowing anyone to check a
> chord immediately for consonance, I have included it
> below with the associated reference table and url -
> however, I don't "get" the third column. Where are
> they getting the freq ratio values from? How is the
> third column derived from the first? My music
> theory is elementary, just learning. They say
> "repeat period for the major chord is 4 times the
> period of the lowest note in the chord", what is the
> 'period' of the lowest note in the chord? Its freq
> in hertz? The below taken from the website;
>
> =====================================
> http://www.phy.mtu.edu/~suits/chords.html
> "What makes a chord sound consonant or dissonant
> depends upon human physiology and psychology. One
> "rule" is based on work by Helmholtz and relies on
> "overlapping harmonics." A nice explanation is
> contained in the article by Jan Wild listed below.
> Basically, for each pair of notes in the chord, find
> the lowest harmonics which match. If it is the 8th
> or less in every case, the chord is consonant. For
> example, the major triad has frequency radios of
> 4:5:6. The harmonics of the lowest note are then 4,
> 8, 16, 20, 24, etc. and the harmonics of the second
> are 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, etc. The fifth of the lower
> matches with the fourth of the upper so this
> interval should be consonant. (i.e. they are both
> less than the 9th harmonic). One gets a similar
> result for 4 and 6, and 5 and 6. Hence, the entire
> major triad is consonant. "
>
> ChordHalf Steps between notesFreq.
>
RatiosMajor4-34:5:6Minor3-410:12:15Diminished3-3160:192:231
> (approx. 20:24:29)7th4-3-320:25:30:36Min.
> 7th3-4-310:12:15:18Maj. 7th4-3-48:10:12:15
> The fundamental beat frequency associated with a
> chord can be determined by looking at the repeat
> period - that is, for the frequency ratios given
> above (which are reduced to the lowest possible
> integer values), the repeat period for the major
> chord is 4 times the period of the lowest note in
> the chord. For the 7th, it is 20 times that of the
> lowest note. Since f = 1/T, the fundamental beat
> frequency for the major chord is 1/4th the frequency
> of the lowest note, and for the 7th, it is 1/20th
> the frequency of the lowest note. If you listen
> carefully, you can hear the beat frequency as an
> additional unplayed note. "
> ====================
> So using this formula, what frequency ratios would
> be associated with the following chords, and how
> would they be derived? I realize that some of these
> may not seem like normal chords,
> but if you could stretch the rules and 'make' it
> work for each, what would these ratios be?
> (f - in the below means flat). The most important
> thing I need to know, in as simple English, and as
> simple an explanation as possible, is HOW are the
> frequency ratios derived? I just don't get
> this......
>
> Bf+C+G
> F+D+Df2
> D+E+F
> Bf + D + B
> G + Ef + C
> Bf + Df + Df
> E + D + F
>
>
> Thanks for any help you may provide....
>
>
> D

can anyone explain to the general public what he is talking about? Please?

cheers!!!
the mark
All things sound good in the SWEETSPOT
The Mark
IAA Member
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2004 3:53 am
Location: Makati

Postby sabine on Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:28 am

Uh, umm, ah, duh? You lost me there buddy. I get the part where he wants to produce musical chords from this mechanism he's got. If that's he wants to do why not tune from another musical instrument? Obviously I didn't understand the problem either. Good luck Mark
Audio is "mind over matter"......if you don't mind, it doesn't matter

http://spinstudios.tripod.com
sabine
IAA Member
 
Posts: 246
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Quezon City

Postby glassjaw_jc on Fri Apr 22, 2005 2:49 pm

well, what he basically want's to know is how to construct chords... so his process can produce the correct set of notes to make the chord sound "harmonious"

tell him to consult a music professor... he needs a background in chord construction... mahabang lesson yan...
glassjaw_jc
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 4:53 am

Postby Tarkuz on Fri Apr 22, 2005 5:24 pm

The Mark, I think I can answer his question and explain the chord to frequency ratio relationship but I want him to analyze it himself. Okay, this is a long post...

Example: A = 440 Hz

One octave above A = 440 Hz is A = 880 Hz. Just double the frequency.

There are 12 notes in the chromatic scale A, A#, B, C, C#, D, D#, E, F, F#, G, and G#. The next note after G# is A again but one octave higher than the first A.

I forgot how I derived the formula but to get the frequency of A#, multiply the frequency of A with the 12th root of 2. The 12th root of 2 is equal to 1.05946309. Use a scientific calculator.

A# = 440 x 1.05946309 = 466 Hz

To get the frequency of B, multiple the frequency of A# with the 12th root of 2.

B = 466 x 1.05946309 = 494 Hz

By arithmetic progression,

C = 494 x 1.05946309 = 523 Hz (this is middle C)
C# = 523 x 1.05946309 = 554 Hz
D = 554 x 1.05946309 = 587 Hz
D# = 587 x 1.05946309 = 622 Hz
E = 622 x 1.05946309 = 659 Hz
F = 659 x 1.05946309 = 698 Hz
F# = 698 x 1.05946309 = 740 Hz
G = 740 x 1.05946309 = 784 Hz
G# = 784 x 1.05946309 = 830 Hz
A = 830 x 1.05946309 = 880 Hz (one octave above A = 440 Hz)
A# = 880 x 1.05946309 = 932 Hz (double A# = 466 Hz)
B = 932 x 1.05946309 = 988 Hz (double B = 494 Hz)
C = 988 x 1.05946309 = 1046 Hz (one octave above middle C)

The Mark, please note that 1 kHz is between B = 988 Hz and C = 1046 Hz. Wala lang. :) Anyway, napansin ko na ang frequencies sa 1/3 octave graphic eq ay separated by major thirds. Kung ang 630 Hz ay E, ang susunod 800 Hz ay G#, ang 1 kHz ay C. Rounded-off ang frequencies ha? Tapos kung tingnan natin ang chord formation ng tatlong magkakatabi na frequency na yan, lalabas ay augmented triad. Tama? Ganon din sa next 3 frequencies. Paulit-ulit lang yan pati sa succeeding frequencies, puro augmented triads...

That is just the start. Now let's go to the ratios.

For the major triad, it was mentioned that its frequency ratio is 4:5:6. Let's check out the A major triad:

A = 440 Hz
C# = 554 Hz
E = 659 Hz

Rounding-off, we get 440:550:660. Reducing to lowest terms, the result is 4:5:6 ratio. So there's the formula for a major triad!

The chord consisting of the notes B flat, C, and G is like B flat 6/9 without a 3rd and without a 5th or simply an inversion of C dominant 7 without a 3rd. Anyway, just write down the frequencies of the notes B flat, C, and G.

B flat = A# = 466 Hz
C = 523 Hz
G = 784 Hz

So the ratio is 466:523:784. I'm leaving it up to the math students to round-off the numbers and reduce the ratio to lowest terms. Sorry I am too lazy to do it here.

It is also important to know other chords and terms like major 4ths, minor 3rds, diminished 3rds, 7ths, etc.

Hope this answers his question.
Human beings, they're quite a paradox. At first glance they're so primitive: genetic impurities, no telepathy, violent, and yet they've created so many beautiful ways to convey their ideas - literature, art, music. [#98 In the Flesh]
User avatar
Tarkuz
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Battlefield

Postby audio-e on Fri Apr 22, 2005 9:18 pm

Wow! sir Tarkuz, that kinda boggled my brain for a while. :? but hmmmmm... cge, in my free time i'll read your post again ang break it down slowly. this is serious man! :D
One Cubed, 1 world, 1 muzik, 1 HOPE!!
audio-e
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:32 pm
Location: Makati City, Philippines

Postby Tarkuz on Fri Apr 22, 2005 9:57 pm

We're just in semitone intervals, equal temperament. Quartertone interval is another story. :wink: Microtonal intervals are difficult but interesting. :shock:
Human beings, they're quite a paradox. At first glance they're so primitive: genetic impurities, no telepathy, violent, and yet they've created so many beautiful ways to convey their ideas - literature, art, music. [#98 In the Flesh]
User avatar
Tarkuz
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Battlefield

Postby darq on Sat Apr 23, 2005 12:52 am

Tarkuz, now I know why I haven't heard you playin' music: you're into the math of music than the music of the math !! Seriously, I like your numbers !!
Include music math in our next seminar, please.
User avatar
darq
IAA Founder
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 1:46 am

Postby The Mark on Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:13 am

WHOA!!!! kung pwede lang akong pumalakpak at magtatatalon gagawin ko na ngayon!!!:D
ang galing sir. i finally understand it myself.

thanks so much for enlightening us all:) now next thing i want to ask is will you render the IAA aperformance in the orientation of the next seminar hehehe:D

cheers,
The Mark
All things sound good in the SWEETSPOT
The Mark
IAA Member
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2004 3:53 am
Location: Makati

Postby MG on Sat Apr 23, 2005 8:14 am

Tarkuz...I always knew that it just wasn't your stage presence that convinced me to hire you for the band. :wink:

I guess we have to integrate music theory into our lectures. ... how about it gents?
MG
IAA Founder
 
Posts: 630
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2004 9:25 am

Postby sabine on Sat Apr 23, 2005 12:04 pm

Whew! Those were some info numbers there. Yeah maybe you guys can include music theory for musically impaired guys like me. :cry:
Audio is "mind over matter"......if you don't mind, it doesn't matter

http://spinstudios.tripod.com
sabine
IAA Member
 
Posts: 246
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Quezon City


Return to Background Noise - IAA Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest